I accidentally saw a report last year that a rural woman gave birth to seven children, and her husband went to jail again. The seven children were in tattered clothes. Everyday life is to work in the fields with her mother. I’m full, because I don’t have money and I don’t dare to expect an education. The comments below are not the same sympathetic comments as in the past, but a uniform scolding and accusation. Ironically, fertility is great! But more is to accuse you of being so poor, why are you still alive so many?
Those who ask these words do not understand the reality of the countryside, and I want to say that it is precisely because poverty is the cause of their proliferation. This is a kind of poor culture, usually the poorer the education is lower. The more children there are, those who are unwilling to have children or only have one, most of them are middle-class or upper-class people in the metropolis. At this time, with more resource economy and more free thinking, women are unwilling The same goes for men who have so many children.
In recent years, the two-child policy has been liberalized. It didn\'t take long for the three-child policy to be introduced again. However, people who are well educated and living in metropolises will not have a second child. Why not have a second child? Because they know how high the cost of living is now that they can’t go to school without a house, what are the consequences of raising a poor child? Poor raising is tantamount to chronic suicide, and the vicious cycle and reincarnation of generations is tantamount to creating slaves to the upper class.
Now it’s not a society that required a lot of labor to cultivate as in the 1970s and 1980s. It’s now a civilized and technological society. If you are already poor and have three babies, then you must have no money to invest in education and have two and three children. It will make you more and more embarrassed, and it will bring you back to the pre-revolutionary period. It will not benefit the family who gave birth to the baby at all, but it will benefit the government greatly.
Why is it good for the government? First, according to the 2017 household registration census, China’s population is now declining rapidly and aging is serious. It is estimated that by 2040, most of the elderly in China will have passed away. Now the middle-aged people are also old, but there is no new replacement. Jobs require uneducated and educated people, such as babysitters, waiters, cleaners, and job workers. These jobs require poor people’s children to do. If the poor don’t have children, who will do it?
The task of giving birth to a child as a slave must be done by the lowest-level people. If they are not born, they will be kidnapped by morals. The group of people who are often ignorant and stick to morals are often the low-level people. The low-level people are poor and love face and love to compare. Often use this kind of heart to kidnap them.
People who have rights and capital usually don\'t care about rumors and rumors. Rich children don\'t do low-level jobs. In order to stabilize their status, the government usually fools the poor to have more lives. The government will say you have a baby! We support, and the serious consequences and costs of waiting for the poor to be born are borne by the poor themselves. In this way, the children of the poor can never enjoy a good family environment education, nor can they study abroad like the children of the rich, but those who have studied abroad, They all have their own independent thinking ability, they pursue individualism to maintain their own thoughts and special, often the bottom-level people love others the most.
Especially the people who have not enjoyed good environmental education like others, easy to be brainwashed by the government, easy to be fooled by the government’s policy of fooling the people, on the contrary, if the poor don’t have a baby, or they have an only child, they have extra money to let children. Enjoying a good education, children will have the ability to think and are not easily brainwashed, then the status of the government is at stake. If the children of the poor do not do the work of the slaves at the bottom, then no one will serve the people of the upper class, they will have to If they are forced to do low-level work by themselves, their status will be lost.
Yes, now society is based on the law of two to eight. Let’s try to imagine that if eight of the poor have gone somewhere else, they will not appear in mainland China anyway, leaving behind the two of the rich, which means There are no poor people in China now. Everyone, imagine what will happen to China? Haha! I know you can\'t think of it, then let me tell you! In order to consolidate its position, the government often sacrifices opportunities for progress. You think it is impossible for everything to be intelligentized by robots. Even if it is intelligent, can you ensure that

相关专题：will